In Fotheringham v. Fotheringham, 2001 BCSC 1321 at para. 46, Mr. Justice Bouck set out a four-step inquiry for deciding whether to award or not award costs. The first three considerations are: 1. First, by focusing on the "matters in dispute" at the trial. These may or may not include "issues" explicitly mentioned in the pleadings. 2. Second, by assessing the weight or importance of those "matters" to the parties. 3. Third, by doing a global determination with respect to all the matters in dispute and determining which party "substantially succeeded," overall and therefore won the event.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.