The final branch of the Fotheringham analysis is to consider whether there is any reason to deprive the substantially successful party of his or her costs. Conduct that may support a denial of costs include giving false evidence at trial or during an examination for discovery or failing to comply promptly with disclosure obligations or other misconduct that manifestly warrants review: LeClair v. Mibrella Inc., 2011 BCSC 533.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.