However, in the present case there is privity between the purchasers and the mortgagee, which privity arises by reason of the agreement to assume the mortgage between the purchasers and the mortgagee. Forster v. Ivey can only stand for the proposition that where there is no privity between the purchasers and the mortgagee the status of the mortgagor does not change to that of a surety.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.