At p. 408, La Forest J. noted with approval the dissenting reasons of Wilson J. in Frame v. Smith, 1987 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 99, at p. 136, who proposed a three-step analysis to guide the courts in identifying new fiduciary relationships: She [Wilson J.] stated that relationships in which a fiduciary obligation has been imposed are marked by the following three characteristics: (1) scope for the exercise of some discretion or power; (2) that power or discretion can be exercised unilaterally so as to effect the beneficiary’s legal or practical interests; and (3) a peculiar vulnerability to the exercise of that discretion or power.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.