What is the standard of relevancy and proportionality in disclosure in the context of a family law case?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation v. Kachurowski, 2018 MBQB 159 (CanLII):
This court recently reviewed the standard of relevancy and proportionality in the context of disclosure in the context of a family law case. In my opinion, those comments are equally applicable here, especially in view of the nature of the disclosure being sought in both cases. In Friedman v. Friedman, 2018 MBQB 91, [2018] M.J. No. 155, Johnston J. held:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the relevant case law in the context of the respondent's claim for damages from the respondent? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is the court’s position on costs for personal injury cases in the context of the case management system? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the case law on freedom of expression in the context of the Charter of Canada? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the grounds for a motion of no confidence in a family law case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a civil case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the context of a motion for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the relevant case law on building restrictions affecting a property? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge disregard a Memoranda that was agreed upon at a family court case conference? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles to apply in the context of a motion by a plaintiff to have his case considered on the merits of the motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
In the context of a custody and access matter, can a judge be found to have made an error in a family law matter? (Manitoba, Canada)
