In Gibbs v. Skemp, [1998] B.C.J. No. 680 (S.C.) Bennett J. reduced a plaintiff’s damages by 10% for failure to mitigate. She said (para. 58): I find that the plaintiff failed to follow the exercise program that was recommended. I accept that she did some walking, but by and large she maintained a sedentary life-style that has been confirmed by the medical evidence. This was likely the worst thing she could do in terms of achieving recovery. She has an obligation to assist in her recovery, even if it meant becoming more physically active than before. The burden of establishing a failure to mitigate is on the defendant. I find that the defendant has met the onus in this case that the plaintiff did not take all reasonable steps towards her recovery.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.