The means by which evidence may be presented on an extradition hearing is streamlined. For example, a hearsay summary of evidence is admissible if the requirements of s. 32 and 33 of the Act are otherwise met. There are, however, limits to the extent of permissible streamlining and the hearing is not a mere formality. Accordingly, the evidence must include sufficient detail for the extradition judge to assess and determine its sufficiency: United States of America v. Anderson, 2006 QCCS 4211.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.