Can a property’s highest and best use at the time of expropriation be taken into account in a compensation claim?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Tanex Industries Ltd. v Greater Vancouver Water District, 2019 BCSC 74 (CanLII):

A property’s highest and best use may not necessarily be the use at the time of expropriation. If it is not, then the costs to elevate its use to that point can be taken into account in a compensation award: Nguyen v. British Columbia (Transportation and Infrastructure), 2018 BCSC 192 at paras. 117-122.

Other Questions


Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for expropriation of a property with the highest use and best use of near-term development? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a property owner who has spent large amounts of time negotiating with the expropriating authority on the issue of compensation for a construction project, then about face up front and argue it is void? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a joint tenant of a property owned by a deceased spouse entitled to claim the property from the deceased? (British Columbia, Canada)
How should corporate and distributive taxes be taken into account in the division of property? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that some funds may have been transferred to the joint account of a joint account with a different bank account make up for the failure to plead or lead evidence on false statement and inducement? (British Columbia, Canada)
When one spouse excludes property that is real property, is that a spouse entitled to an undivided half interest in the increased value of the property? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an owner of a strata claim damages or recover property damages or loss of property value against another owner? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court take no account of the amount of cash or other assets held by the husband in order to fund a compensation claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the preponderance of evidence supporting the respondent's claim that his interest in the Mazraa Property constitutes excluded property? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.