Counsel for the defendant states that Ewing is arguably wrongly decided, as the case law requires that each factor is to be given equal importance in determining whether a transfer is desirable in the interest of justice, whereas Vallee J. seemed to focus only on the issue of delay. While a delay in obtaining a trial date can carry substantial weight in the balancing exercise, all factors must still be balanced: Sauve v. Tavares, [2012] O.J. No. 2148 (S.C.J.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.