Evidence to the contrary must raise a reasonable doubt. The court must consider all of the evidence in deciding whether to accept or reject the evidence to the contrary. The court cannot rely on the breathalyser results alone to assess the credibility of the accused who has proffered evidence to the contrary. See Regina v. Jedig, [2000] O.J. No. 1120, Ontario Supreme Court of Justice.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.