Can an employer take a contribution holiday and recover surplus from an employee pension plan?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Williams v. College Pension Board of Trustees, 2005 BCSC 788 (CanLII):

The defendants rely on the seminal decision in Schmidt v. Air Products Canada Ltd., 1994 CanLII 104 (SCC), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 611, and this particular passage at ¶ 87-89: Once funds are contributed to the pension plan they are "accrued benefits" of the employees. However, the benefits are of two distinct types. Employees are first entitled to the defined benefits provided under the plan. This is an amount fixed according to a formula. The other benefit to which the employees may be entitled is the surplus remaining upon termination. This amount is never certain during the continuation of the plan. Rather, the surplus exists only on paper. It results from actuarial calculations and is a function of the assumptions used by the actuary. Employees can claim no entitlement to surplus in an ongoing plan because it is not definite. The right to any surplus is crystallized only when the surplus becomes ascertainable upon termination of the plan. Therefore, the taking of a contribution holiday represents neither an encroachment upon the trust nor a reduction of accrued benefits. Similar reasoning explains why I cannot accept the proposition that an employer entitled to take a contribution holiday must also be entitled to recover surplus on termination. While a plan which takes the form of a trust is in operation, the surplus is an actuarial surplus. Neither the employer nor the employees have a specific interest in this amount, since it only exists on paper, although the employee beneficiaries have an equitable interest in the total assets of the fund while it is in existence. When the plan is terminated, the actuarial surplus becomes an actual surplus and vests in the employee beneficiaries. The distinction between actual and actuarial surplus means that there is no inconsistency between the entitlement of the employer to contribution holidays and the disentitlement of the employer to recovery of the surplus on termination. The former relies on actuarial surplus, the latter on actual surplus.

Other Questions


If an employer loses trust in an employee as a result of an employer's orders, in the matter of substance being willfully disobeyed and met with insubordination, can an employer dismiss the employee? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an employer induced an employee to enter into a new employment relationship with the employee? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employer use a pension contribution holiday? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employee who declines an offer of re-employment from the same employer, after having been dismissed whether actually or constructively, be found to have failed to mitigate her damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a spouse entitled to receive a pension benefit from the Pension Corporation of BC Pension Corporation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employer terminate an employee for refusing to accept a raise if the employee takes the position that unless he receives a raise by a certain date? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff be considered a travelling employee for workers’ compensation purposes when he drives from his home to his employer’s office in Richmond, after driving to the employer's office? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employee recover any amount of ESA holiday pay that has been paid out under the ESA? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employer unilaterally change the terms of an employee's employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making a contribution to an employer's disability plan? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.