Emery v. Emery, 2010 BCCA 229, 85 R.F.L. (6th) 251, concerned a payor who had retired from employment at an early age. The retirement was accepted as medically necessary. The judge hearing a variation application “vacated” or suspended the support obligations for a period of months, predicting that the payor would find other employment for which he was medically suited to supplement his pension.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.