Does the writ of habeas corpus, challenging illegality of detention, become a sham if it is not acted within a reasonable time?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Yong v. INS, 208 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2000):

Nor do we now. "The writ of habeas corpus, challenging illegality of detention, is reduced to a sham if . .. trial courts do not act within a reasonable time." Jones v. Shell, 572 F.2d 1278, 1280 (8th Cir. 1978) (footnote omitted). A long stay also threatens to create the perception that courts are more concerned with efficient trial management than with the vindication of constitutional rights.

Other Questions


Does section 2241 of the Habeas corpus act as a substitute for a motion of habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a habeas petition timely if it is filed within a reasonable time? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the statute of limitations between the time a criminal conviction becomes final on direct review and the time the first state collateral challenge is filed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a prisoner challenge a disciplinary conviction by petition for writ of habeas corpus if the conviction resulted in the loss of good time credits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for whether a person who has been found unfit to stand trial for murder by reason of reason is considered to be a "dangerous person" under s. 19(1)(a)(ii) of the Mental Health Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the proper venue for a writ of habeas corpus petition challenging a conviction in a judgment of a state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the writ of habeas corpus have ever been used to obtain release from illegal custody? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a prisoner have to file a second application for habeas corpus for a third time? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the totality of the circumstances and what is the test for determining if a defendant has known for a long period of time that they may have committed acts that were reasonably likely to elicit incriminating responses? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a product that becomes "well known in Canada" by word-mouth, by reason of its reputation and use in the United States satisfy the requirements of s. 5 of the Trade Marks Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.