California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rathbun v. Superior Court, 8 Cal.App.3d 690, 87 Cal.Rptr. 568 (Cal. App. 1970):
2 Bigelow v. Smik, 6 Cal.App.3d 10, 85 Cal.Rptr. 613, cited by petitioner, holding that the limitations statute (Code Civ.Proc., 351) for commencing an action is not extended when a method of substituted service is available (Veh.Code, 17450, et seq.) is not applicable in the case under review inasmuch as the action was filed within the statutory period.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.