Does the standard instruction in a motor vehicle accident (CALCRIM No. 3160) require a pinpoint instruction?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Espinoza, 2d Crim. No. B293401 (Cal. App. 2019):
Moreover, the pinpoint instruction's list of injuries might lead jurors to believe that only the injuries on that list qualify as great bodily injuries. That creates an unnecessary potential conflict between the standard instruction (CALCRIM No. 3160) and the pinpoint.
Espinoza claims this pinpoint instruction was required by People v. Nava (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 1490. We disagree.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant give a mistake of fact jury instruction in a motor vehicle accident trial where he got into the victims' vehicle because he thought it was his black SUV? (California, United States of America)
Does a "driver" for purposes of Vehicle Code section 20002 include an owner of a vehicle involved in a accident when the owner is also a passenger in the vehicle at the time of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Are instructions on the lesser included charge of involuntary manslaughter required in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
Is there a mistake in the instruction of sua sponte instruction on accident in a motor vehicle case? (California, United States of America)
