The following excerpt is from United States v. Bombino, No. 17-2701 (2nd Cir. 2018):
F.3d 169, 173 (2d Cir. 1999) (finding no breach where "it was [the sentencing judge], not the Government, who raised questions" and "directed the Government to provide him with the pertinent information, which was clearly within his power")); cf. United States v. Vaval, 404 F.3d 144, 154 (2d Cir. 2005) ("[T]he provision of requested legal and factual information to the court . . . is an essential function of the government at sentencing.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.