California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Dunford v. General Water Heater Corp., 150 Cal.App.2d 260, 309 P.2d 958 (Cal. App. 1957):
In Pollind v. v. Polich, 78 Cal.App.2d 87, 92, 177 P.2d 63, the rule of intentional concealment was again stated, but it was held that the challenged conduct of the juror did not measure up to that standard.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.