Does the rule in Harris v Hass apply even when the suspect has asked for an attorney?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lam Thanh Nguyen, 191 Cal.Rptr.3d 182, 354 P.3d 90, 61 Cal.4th 1015 (Cal. 2015):

In Oregon v. Hass (1975) 420 U.S. 714, 723, 95 S.Ct. 1215, 43 L.Ed.2d 570, the high court held that the rule in Harris applies even when the suspect has asked for an attorney

[354 P.3d 133]

Other Questions


Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney who is sued for malpractice by a former client cross-complain for equitable indemnity against a successor attorney who has been hired to extricate the client from the condition created by the predecessor attorney? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney who chooses to litigate in propria persona rather than retain an attorney to represent him recover attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority to apply the rule in People v. Francis to apply retroactively to the amended version of section 12022.5 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted consent in cases where officers asked for access to a suspect's room without the consent of the suspect? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney litigant represented by other attorneys in his firm recover attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
If an attorney's work is complete upon signing of a decree of distribution, and if so, how much work must be done by the attorney to complete the work before the attorney has to engage other counsel for the remaining 60% of his work? (California, United States of America)
Can a letter between the Attorney General and Attorney General be admitted as a public record? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to deny a defendant's ability to pay his attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.