The following excerpt is from Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 961 F.3d 160 (2nd Cir. 2020):
Kilgour v. SEC , 942 F.3d 113, 122 (2d Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). Petitioners argue that the amounts of mercury manufactured, imported, and exported can vary considerably from year to year. But notwithstanding this variance, petitioners do not establish that the asynchrony between the reporting obligations under the Reporting Rule and the CDR Rule will so significantly distort the results of the triennial inventory as to make the Reporting Rule's partial exemption for high-volume manufacturers unreasonable.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.