Does the parol evidence rule apply in this case?

Plaintiffs correctly point out that, in California, the parol evidence rule provides for certain exceptions, including establishing fraud. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code 1856(g); see also Tenzer v. Superscope, 39 Cal.3d 18 (Cal. 1985). Here, Plaintiffs are not seeking to enforce or void the written agreement; instead, they are seeking a judgment of nondischargeability and damages for fraud in the inducement. Thus, the parol evidence rule does not apply in this case.