California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Marriage of Epstein, In re, 147 Cal.Rptr. 595, 83 Cal.App.3d 55 (Cal. App. 1978):
The applicability of the no-reimbursement rule of See v. See, supra, 64 Cal.2d 778, 51 Cal.Rptr. 888, 415 P.2d 776, to post-separation payments out of separate property was recently considered, in a related context, in In re Marriage of Smith (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 725, 145 Cal.Rptr. 205. In Smith, husband sought reimbursement for payments which he made after separation on preexisting community debts. In considering the no-reimbursement rule of See, the court first noted that See and the cases
Page 601
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.