The following excerpt is from Hiken v. Dep't of Def., 836 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2016):
The majority relies upon the case of Lolli v. County of Orange , 351 F.3d 410 (9th Cir. 2003) and the cases cited in Lolli. See Majority Opinion , p. 1043. However, a closer reading of the cases cited in Lolli reveals the existence of factual circumstances that are not present in this case.
In United States v. Belgarde , 300 F.3d 1177, 1180 (9th Cir. 2002), we expressed our belief that all parties understood that the government was appealing the dismissal of the Indictment following denial of a motion to reconsider. No such understanding existed in this case.
In McCarthy v. Mayo , 827 F.2d 1310, 1314 (9th Cir. 1987), we observed that [i]n denying [the] post-judgment motion, the district court incorporated the prior order ... No similar incorporation of the prior order accompanied the district court's denial of Task Force's motion for reconsideration.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.