Does the interpretation of the Immigration and Customs Code by the Department of Justice have to be given greater deference by the courts?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. I.N.S., 22 F.3d 909 (9th Cir. 1994):
6 Although the courts are the "final arbiters of statutory interpretation," we recognize that an "agency's construction of a statute that it is charged with administering is entitled to some deference." Purba v. INS, 884 F.2d 516, 517 (9th Cir.1989).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the US Department of Justice wrong to deny a plaintiff's right to sue the Department of Immigration and Customs? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims for denial of access to court by the Department of Justice? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a conclusion by a state court on a mixed issue involving questions both of fact and law, does the court have to give the state court full deference? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the 9th Circuit of the US Supreme Court have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the District Court of Appeal against the US Department of Justice for a reconsideration motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a Minister of Employment and Immigration (minister of employment and immigration) bring a claim against the Minister of Justice for Ministerial Responsibility for Immigration and Refugee Protection Division in a federal civil case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
If a motion is brought before the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of a motion before the Court of Appeal, and the motion has been adjourned for a second time, is there an instance where this court should take jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to compel the Court to dismiss a motion alleging that a judge has improperly interpreted the interpretation of a statutory interpretation of an administrative determination? ("New York", United States of America)
