Does the federal preemption doctrine apply in a matter involving sexual harassment and claims of retaliatory discharge?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Terra Linda Farms, Inc. v. California Fair Emp't & Hous. Comm'n, F059869 (Cal. App. 2012):
The application of the federal preemption doctrine in a matter involving sexual harassment and claims of retaliatory discharge was addressed in Delahunty v. Cahoon
Page 13
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a federal decision construing a state forfeiture statute apply the same weight and authority as it applies to a federal forfeiture statute? (California, United States of America)
Does the provocative act murder doctrine apply when the felony-murder doctrine does not apply? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for harassment and failure to prevent sexual harassment claims? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a jury found there was a reasonable likelihood that a plaintiff made a complaint of sexual harassment or sexual harassment? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of forfeiture apply to claims involving a trial court's failure to properly make or articulate its discretionary sentencing choices? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the federal federal preemption rule on the exhaustion doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an action brought by a plaintiff who alleges that he was sexually harassed and sexually harassed by another plaintiff? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a jury found there was a reasonable likelihood that a plaintiff made a complaint of sexual harassment or sexual harassment? (California, United States of America)
Is there a common law right of in-house counsel to maintain retaliatory discharge claims? (California, United States of America)
Is a new federal constitutional rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions, like that of the Payne case, to apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal? (California, United States of America)
