Does the fact that information that was not previously part of the public domain constitute a cause of action for violation of the right to privacy?

4 The fact that information is not previously part of the "public domain" may in some cases be considered in determining whether a cause of action for violation of the right to privacy may be stated. (See Kapellas v. Kofman (1969) 1 Cal.3d 20, 36, 81 Cal.Rptr. 360, 459 P.2d 912.) But this factor is not in itself sufficient to give rise to a cause of action where the legitimate public interest in the published information is substantial. (Ibid.) "Because of their public responsibilities, government officials and candidates for such office have almost always been considered the paradigm case of 'public figures' who should be subjected to the most thorough scrutiny." (Ibid., fn. omitted.)