Does the exclusionary rule in a personal injury case have to be considered "harmless"?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Gargiso, 456 F.2d 584 (2nd Cir. 1972):

4 It has been suggested that it is easier to declare an error involving an exclusionary rule "harmless" when, as here, the case was tried to a court, not to a jury. See United States v. Krol, 374 F.2d 776, 779 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 835, 88 S.Ct. 46, 19 L.Ed.2d 97 (1967).

Other Questions


What is considered harmless error by a jury in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for assessing personal injury fees in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How do you deal with a claim of personal injury in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the state's position on personal injury law in the context of personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a client who relies on his attorney for personal injury purposes have an obligation to timely filing in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of damages for personal injury damages in personal injury cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances has the Court considered "ineffective assistance of counsel"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is considered to be inadmissible parol evidence in a personal injury case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a personal injury action, does the fact-finder need to consider the effect of an interminable discrepancy or lacunae in determining whether it is consequential? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.