California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Batten, G050277 (Cal. App. 2016):
Defendant contends the DNA sample obtained when he was arrested should be suppressed as the tainted fruit of his prolonged detention. (See Wong Sun v. United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471, 485 ["exclusionary rule has traditionally barred from trial physical, tangible materials obtained either during or as a direct result of" a Fourth Amendment violation].) The record does not support his contention. At the hearing on
Page 16
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.