The following excerpt is from Ameripride Servs. Inc. v. Valley Indus. Serv. Inc., NO. CIV. S-00-113 LKK/JFM (E.D. Cal. 2011):
"created because of anticipated litigation, and would not have been created in substantially similar form but for the prospect of that litigation." In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 357 F.3d at 908 (internal citations omitted). The doctrine does not protect materials assembled in the ordinary course of business. Griffith v. Davis, 161 F.R.D. 687, 698-99 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.