The following excerpt is from Roberts v. Cate, Case No. 11-cv-2869-L(WMc) (S.D. Cal. 2013):
or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ. Holley v. Yarborough, 568 F.3d 1091, 1101 (9th Cir. 2009).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.