Does the Court of Appeal err in refusing an instruction from the trial court on the lesser offense of attempted voluntary manslaughter?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. McAlroy, 1 Cal.App.4th 1247, 271 Cal.Rptr. 335 (Cal. App. 1990):

The conclusion reached by the majority that the trial court did not err in refusing an instruction requested by McAlroy on the lesser offense of attempted voluntary manslaughter is premised on the holding in People v. Spurlin, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at p. 128, 202 Cal.Rptr. 663, to the effect that the judicially created concept of "non-statutory" manslaughter was eliminated with the abrogation of the diminished capacity defense through the passage of Proposition 8. Even though the elimination of the crime of "non-statutory" voluntary manslaughter may have been one of the objectives of the promoters of Proposition 8, there is a serious question as to whether that objective was actually accomplished.

Other Questions


Does a jury have a duty to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter and attempted voluntary manslaughter as lesser included offenses of murder and attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to consider whether to consider the lesser included charge of attempted voluntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense of attempted premeditated murder? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, if the trial court improperly failed to instruct on a lesser included offense, does the court have to re-examine the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have to continue to consider the lesser included offenses of involuntary manslaughter and voluntary manslaughter as a defense? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of the trial court's failure to give instructions on the lesser included offenses of voluntary and involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
What is the court's obligation to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of attempted voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
What is the de novo standard of review applied to an appeal that contends the trial court should have instructed sua sponte on a lesser included offense or defense? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a trial court instructed only on the completed offense of robbery but did not so-instruct on the attempted crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to the lesser included offense of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a sua sponte duty to instruct on voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, and simple assault as lesser included offenses to murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.