Does the court need to consider whether to grant a defendant's flight instructions?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gardner, 151 Cal.Rptr. 123, 87 Cal.App.3d 476 (Cal. App. 1978):
Accordingly, we are left only to determine whether the court acted properly in light of People v. Cannady (1972) 8 Cal.3d 379, 105 Cal.Rptr. 129, 503 P.2d 585, which cautions that flight instructions are called for only where the jury can "reasonably infer that defendant('s) flight reflected consciousness of guilt." (Id., at p. 391, 105 Cal.Rptr. at p. 137, 503 P.2d at p. 593.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal instructing a jury to consider whether a murder committed by a defendant was of the first or second degree? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal instructing a jury to consider whether a murder committed by a defendant was of the first or second degree? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for instructing a jury with the flight instruction where there is evidence of a defendant's flight? (California, United States of America)
When will a court grant a defendant an instruction that cautions the jury that it may not draw an adverse inference from the fact that a defendant has not testified at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court's refusal of a defendant's request to instruct the jury not to consider specific evidence in their instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does the court have to add an instruction to the jury that, in the event the jury found defendant guilty of the lesser included charge of involuntary manslaughter, it should also consider whether he personally used an assault weapon or firearm? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered whether a defendant has been granted superb representation in a tax evasion case? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have to consider whether a jury has been instructed to disregard an instruction from the Court of Appeal that is not supported by how the jury views the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to propose any modification to a flight instruction forfeits a claim of instructional error? (California, United States of America)
