The following excerpt is from Tampubolon V. Holder Jr., No. 06-70811, No.A095-630-032, No.A097-854-046 (9th Cir. 2010):
(9th Cir. 2003) (holding that the " 'exceptional and extremely unusual hardship' determination is a subjective, discretionary judgment that has been carved out of our appellate jurisdiction"). This court retains jurisdiction, however, to review due process challenges and other questions of law. See, e.g., Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). We review our own jurisdiction de novo. Taslimi, 590 F.3d at 984.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.