The following excerpt is from Vangas v. Montefiore Med. Ctr., 32 A.D. Cases 1535, 823 F.3d 174 (2nd Cir. 2016):
The district court had federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1367. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1291 because it is an appeal from a final order of the district court. In reviewing the district court's grant or denial of a motion for JMOL, our review is de novo. Stampf v. Long Island R.R. Co., 761 F.3d 192, 19798 (2d Cir.2014). Following a bench trial, questions of law are reviewed de novo and factual determinations are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Apple, Inc., 791 F.3d 290, 313 (2d Cir.2015).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.