Does the Court have jurisdiction to award sanctions against a defendant who was found guilty of a charge of recklessly driving while driving under the influence of alcohol?

Appellant also argues the court should not have considered his testimony at the 2009 trial because doing so violated Code of Civil Procedure section 2051. Appellant did not assert this argument in the court below. He has forfeited the right to raise it on appeal. (Evid. Code, 353; see also Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge etc. Dist., supra, 23 Cal.3d at pp. 184-185, fn. 1.) Furthermore, the code section upon which appellant relies does not exist.

d. Whether the Sanction Award Violated Due Process