Does the court have a sua sponte duty to instruct the jury as to voluntary intoxication?

What is the sua sponte duty of a trial court to instruct a jury about voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)

Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)

Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)

How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)

What are the implications of the Court's instructions on mutual combat, contrived self-defense, and voluntary intoxication? (California, United States of America)

Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)

What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)

Does the trial court erred by failing to provide a jury with the following instruction on voluntary intoxication causing unconsciousness? (California, United States of America)

Does a failure to instruct a defendant on intoxication constitute an error in failing to instruct on intoxication? (California, United States of America)