The following excerpt is from Dorado v. Crumb, 3:20-cv-1936-JAH-LL (S.D. Cal. 2021):
[1] See Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 586 (9th Cir. 1995) (court should dismiss claims barred by Heck without prejudice so that [the plaintiff] may reassert his claims if he ever succeeds in invalidating his conviction.); Briggs v. Enriquez, No. CV 17-4615-FMO(E), 2017 WL 6210802, at *4 (CD. Cal. Nov. 1, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 17-4615-FMO(E), 2017 WL 6209818 (CD. Cal. Dec. 7, 2017).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.