California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Alford v. Superior Court, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 672, 29 Cal.4th 1033, 63 P.3d 228 (Cal. 2003):
We are unpersuaded. As the city attorney reasons, petitioner's argument fails to identify any impediment to the public defender's ability to represent him. Moreover, trial courts have broad discretion in ruling on motions to discover police personnel records and, in doing so, as we have discussed, they are implementing a careful balancing process between the directly conflicting, substantial interests of the officer and the defendant. (People v. Samayoa (1997) 15 Cal.4th 795, 827, 64 Cal. Rptr.2d 400, 938 P.2d 2; People v. Jackson (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1164, 1220, 56 Cal. Rptr.2d 49, 920 P.2d 1254.) Arguably, this specific statutory judicial obligation supersedes a public defender's office's general rules concerning distribution of authority to deputies or attribution to all deputies of knowledge gained by any one of them.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.