The following excerpt is from Singh v. Lynch, 802 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2015):
The BIA correctly concluded that because Singh failed to qualify for asylum, he necessarily fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.See AlvarezSantos v. I.N.S., 332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.