California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Arana, A139425 (Cal. App. 2016):
11. The Attorney General also asserts that this claim is barred by judicial estoppel, which " ' " 'precludes a party from gaining an advantage by taking one position, and then seeking a second advantage by taking an incompatible position.' " ' " (People v. Castillo (2010) 49 Cal.4th 145, 155.) Defendant disputes that all the elements of judicial estoppel are met. The application of the judicial estoppel doctrine is discretionary (id. at p. 155), and in light of our determination that any error was invited, we need not decide the estoppel issue.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.