Does the Attorney General have forfeited his confrontation clause claim because defendant failed to object on the ground at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Edwards, 161 Cal.Rptr.3d 191, 306 P.3d 1049, 57 Cal.4th 658 (Cal. 2013):

The Attorney General asserts that defendant has forfeited his confrontation clause claim because he failed to object on this ground at trial. We recently rejected a similar forfeiture claim, and for similar reasons do so again here. ( People v. Pearson (2013) 56 Cal.4th 393, 461462, 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 541, 297 P.3d 793 [concluding that a defendant who failed at a 1996 trial to challenge as a violation of the confrontation clause the testimony of a substitute pathologist

[306 P.3d 1088]

Other Questions


Does the Attorney General's claim that defendant forfeited the issue of confrontation clause by failing to object on confrontation clause grounds in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that Defendant has "waived" a claim that the Defendant has failed to object to the victim's restitution award? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the Attorney General's contention that a defendant forfeited any claim of error by failing to object or request modification to an instruction in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion defendant forfeited his claim by failing to object to the instruction at trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Attorney General claim that the Defendant failed to object to the Defendant's conduct at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to claim that defendant forfeited this claim on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has a claim of misconduct against the Attorney General for failing to object at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that defendant forfeited his right to challenge CALCRIM No. 330 on appeal because he did not object to it at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have forfeited the issue of a defendant's substantial rights by failing to object at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's contention that defendant forfeited the claim of juror misconduct by failing to include it in his written new trial motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.