Does the Attorney General have any grounds to oppose the introduction of a confession at the time the confession was introduced?

The attorney general asserts that by failing to object at the time his confession was introduced, appellant waived appellate review. (Evid.Code, 353; People v. Jennings (1988) 46 Cal.3d 963, 975, fn. 3, 251 Cal.Rptr. 278, 760 P.2d 475 ["Generally when an in limine ruling that evidence is admissible has been made, the party seeking exclusion must object at such time as the evidence is actually offered to preserve the issue for appeal. The reason for this rule is that until the evidence is actually offered, and the court is aware of its relevance in context, its probative

Page 768