California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carrillo, B276697 (Cal. App. 2017):
The Attorney General recognizes theft provides a basis for violation of Vehicle Code section 10851, but argues it makes no sense to apply Penal Code section 490.2: "So construed, the law would require that the defendant with the more culpable mental state (the intent to permanently deprive the owner of possession) be convicted of only a misdemeanor, while the defendant with the less culpable mental state (to temporarily deprive the owner of possession) could be convicted of a felony." This is akin to an equal protection argument; and People v. Wilkinson (2004) 33 Cal.4th 821, upon which the Attorney General relies in his brief, provides the response: "[N]either the existence of two identical criminal statutes prescribing different levels of punishments, nor the exercise of a prosecutor's discretion in charging under one such statute and not the other, violates equal protection principles." (Id. at p. 838.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.