Does the abstract of judgment need to be amended to reflect the oral pronouncement of the trial court?

If an abstract of judgment fails to reflect the judgment pronounced by the trial court, can the abstract be corrected? (California, United States of America)

When there is a discrepancy between the abstract of judgment and the trial court's oral pronouncement of judgment, does the court have to rely on the reporter's transcript? (California, United States of America)

Can a court correct an abstract of judgment that does not reflect the actual sentence imposed in the trial judge's verbal pronouncement? (California, United States of America)

When an abstract of judgment conflicts with the oral pronouncement of judgment, does the court have to correct the abstract? (California, United States of America)

Can an abstract of judgment be amended to reflect the actual sentence imposed in the trial judge's verbal pronouncement? (California, United States of America)

Does the Court of Appeal have any authority to correct clerical errors in abstracts or abstracts that do not accurately reflect the judgment of the sentencing court? (California, United States of America)

Does the abstract of judgment need to be modified to accurately reflect the oral pronouncement of the trial court regarding the prohibition on visitation between defendant and Doe? (California, United States of America)

When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)

Does the Court of Appeal have authority to order the correction of abstracts of judgment in a case where the abstracts do not accurately reflect the sentencing of a defendant? (California, United States of America)

What is the effect of an amended judgment in the Superior Court of Appeal against a defendant who has appealed against the amended judgment? (California, United States of America)