The following excerpt is from Kendrick v. Cnty. of San Diego, Case No.: 15cv2615-GPC(AGS) (S.D. Cal. 2018):
(9th Cir. 2018) (an appellate court has jurisdiction "over issues that do not require resolution of factual disputes, including in cases where officers argue that they have qualified immunity, assuming the facts most favorable to the plaintiff."); Adams v. Speers, 473 F.3d 989, 990-91 (9th Cir. 2007) (the defendant "can make an interlocutory appeal from the ruling on immunity only if he accepts as undisputed the facts presented by the appellees")).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.