California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Guerrero, E065307 (Cal. App. 2017):
Cal.App.3d 181, 193.) Sentencing defendant separately for the elder abuse and criminal threat crimes does not constitute multiple punishment for convictions that arise out of an indivisible, intertwined transaction, having a single intent and objective. (People v. Racy (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 1327, 1336; People v. Avalos (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 1569, 1583.) The trial court therefore did not violate section 654 by sentencing defendant separately for elder abuse and making a criminal threat (counts 1 and 2).
The judgment is affirmed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.