California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Patterson, B277189 (Cal. App. 2017):
"Section 654 precludes multiple punishments for a single act or indivisible course of conduct." (People v. Hester (2000) 22 Cal.4th 290, 294.) In determining whether multiple punishments run afoul of section 654, we look to a defendant's intent and objective. "[I]f all of the offenses were merely incidental to, or were the means of accomplishing or facilitating one objective, defendant may be found to have harbored a single intent and therefore may be punished only once." (People v. Harrison (1989) 48 Cal.3d 321, 335.) Robbing the victims while they were captive in back room was an objective independent of stealing from the store safe. Multiple punishments were not prohibited.
Page 11
The judgments are affirmed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.