California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Brown, B271179 (Cal. App. 2016):
As defendant recognizes, courts have repeatedly rejected his contention that disqualification from Proposition 36 relief requires that arming with a firearm must be tethered to an offense other than possession of a firearm by a felon. "Defendant posits various arguments designed to convince us that section 1170.126 should nonetheless be construed as precluding a finding that a defendant convicted merely possessing a firearm, without any other offense, is ineligible for resentencing relief. We find none convincing." (People v. White (2016) 243 Cal.App.4th 1354, 1363-1365 ["the electorate was entitled to draw a line decreeing that any third strike felon who was actually armed with a prohibited firearmno matter how benign the circumstanceswas categorically
Page 4
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.