Does Defendant have a right to file a supplemental brief?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carrasco, C079565 (Cal. App. 2016):
1. Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.
2. People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the grounds for appeal against a finding that a defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief after the date of the filing of the opening brief? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant have a right to file a supplemental brief in this appeal? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Attorney General find that defendant waived the right to have a supplemental brief arguing that the death qualification process is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of defendant's right to file a supplemental brief to the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who is read his Miranda rights knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive their right to remain silent have knowingly waived their rights? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant required to produce a supplemental probation report if he waives his right to a supplemental report? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a right to file a supplemental brief? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a right to file a supplemental brief? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
