California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gomez, F059747, Super. Ct. No. VCF178900 (Cal. App. 2011):
40. Were we to find error, we would conclude appellant suffered no prejudice therefrom. (See People v. Avila, supra, 46 Cal.4th at p. 709; People v. San Nicolas, supra, 34 Cal.4th at p. 667.)
41. Although appellant never objected on this ground in the trial court, his failure to do so does not constitute waiver, since an ex post facto violation resulting in an unauthorized sentence may be raised on appeal even if the defendant failed to object below. (People v. Hiscox (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 253, 258; People v. Zito (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 736, 741-742.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.