The following excerpt is from Marcu v. I.N.S., 147 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 1998):
We have previously held that an applicant is not required to show a threat of country-wide persecution to be eligible for asylum or withholding of deportation. See Harpinder Singh v. Ilchert, 63 F.3d 1501, 1510 (9th Cir.1995). Once the regulatory presumption is triggered, "the only relevant question is whether conditions in the country have so changed that the threat no longer exists upon his return," not whether the applicant's "past experience reflected conditions nationwide." Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.